How AI Agents Are Solving the 4 Most Critical Challenges for Media Agencies

1. Staff-to-Account Ratios: Scaling Workloads Sustainably

One perennial profitability challenge is the staff-to-account ratio – how many client accounts each team member can handle. Agencies historically cap this to preserve quality, but many are also introducing ambitious goals, like increase the average accounts per strategist without adding headcount. The pain is clear: with current manual workflows, asking one person to manage significantly more campaigns risks burnout, data errors, and unhappy clients. Simply pushing staff harder isn’t a viable long-term strategy.

AI agents in advertising operations offer a path to scale accounts per person sustainably.  

The key is offloading low-level and repetitive AdOps tasks to intelligent software agents so human strategists can focus on high-value strategy and client coordination. For example, traditionally a strategist might spend days manually configuring a large multi-location campaign (entering targeting, creatives, and budgets for dozens of local ads across Google, Meta, etc.). With agentic automation, they could set up the campaign once and let an AI-driven system replicate and customize it across channels.  

Using a bidirectional API integration, a strategist can automatically populate many localized ads from one data source, building multi-channel campaigns in one go. In practice, this meant one person could check pacing for hundreds of campaigns in an hour each week, instead of four people spending multiple days on it. AI agents make such feats possible by handling the heavy lifting.

Multi-agent systems like MINT are designed to amplify a team’s capacity in exactly this way. These systems deploy specialized agents mapped to key media roles – for instance, a Trafficker Agent to handle ad platform setups, a Media Buyer Agent to adjust bids, a Data Analyst Agent to crunch performance numbers, etc. By collaborating in parallel, the agents execute many tasks that would overwhelm a single human. The human strategist becomes more of a “coordinator” or “supervisor,” overseeing the AI-driven workflow (often via an easy interface) and intervening when strategic judgment is needed.  

This kind of hybrid agency operation means one strategist can confidently oversee far more accounts. There are real-world examples of agencies achieving this: reducing manual workloads is the only way to grow client portfolios without ballooning labor costs. AI agents provide that leverage – they free talent from rote work, enabling agencies to decouple headcount from growth and improve profit margins.

‍

2. Budget Pacing and Management: Ensuring Efficient Spend with Agentic AI

Another critical pain point is budget pacing – making sure each client’s ad budget is neither underspent nor overspent by month’s end. This is fundamental to campaign success and agency revenue, yet it’s remarkably labor-intensive and error-prone today. According to the Benchmark Report, 40% of agencies use multiple tools just to pace budgets, and over half still rely on manual methods or spreadsheets. Teams end up checking and updating pacing in siloed platforms daily: these fragmented, manual workflows not only siphon hours of staff time, they introduce business risk – a missed adjustment or calculation error can mean creating an overspend or leaving money on the table.  

Automation in AdOps via AI agents directly addresses this challenge. A Media Optimization Agent (or “Budget Pacer” agent) can monitor spend and performance across all campaigns in real time, something no human can do at scale. For example, if midway through the month one campaign on Google is behind pace while another on Facebook is ahead, the agent can automatically reallocate budget across channels based on live performance insights. Rather than a human logging into two dashboards and fiddling with numbers, an AI agent makes the adjustment on the fly, within guardrails the team sets. This ensures the client’s overall budget is fully spent efficiently, hitting targets without overshoot. Importantly, the agent can also enforce rules – pausing spend if a campaign hits a cap, or alerting a human if an unusual spike occurs – thus protecting the business.

Agencies using Multi-Agent platforms like MINT get this capability out-of-the-box.  The result is a hybrid budgeting process where routine pacing is hands-free, freeing specialists to spend time on strategy and client communication rather than Excel. Given that teams currently spend over 25% of their time (roughly 46 hours a month) on manual campaign adjustments, introducing AI agents for budget management can recapture a huge portion of that time. It’s a tangible efficiency gain and a safeguard against the revenue risks posed by manual pacing errors.

‍

3. Ad Tech Bloat and Data Silos: Streamlining the Tech Stack

Over the past decade, many agencies developed a severe case of “ad tech bloat.” In the quest for better targeting and analytics, they kept adding specialized tools – DSPs, data management platforms, bid optimizers, reporting dashboards, etc. – to their stack. The outcome today is an often-unwieldy patchwork of platforms that don’t seamlessly talk to each other. As industry observers note, “you began with a CRM and a DMP, and added an average of four to five plug-in tools, plus a DSP (or two)... stitching together an ad tech patchwork cardigan” (source: MediaPost).

Each tool might deliver a sliver of value, but collectively this fragmented stack creates complexity that paralyzes operations and splits data into silos. In such an environment, teams waste effort duplicating work in multiple systems, and important insights get lost across disconnected data sources. Tech bloat also drives up costs and maintenance headaches. In short, the chaos of too many tools holds agencies back.

Multi-Agent Systems in agencies are emerging as a fix for this fragmentation. Think of an MAS as an integrated operating system for advertising: rather than humans juggling 5–6 platforms, a well-designed MAS connects to all those systems behind the scenes and lets AI agents orchestrate workflows across them. In practice, this means an agency could ditch many single-purpose interfaces and manage campaigns through one unified layer.

Platforms like MINT exemplify this trend – billed as an Advertising Resource Management solution, MINT integrates with 550+ channels and tracked media systems and ad channels, acting as a central backbone for data and execution. An AI agent within such a system might pull the right harmonized data, combine it with live ad performance, and then execute changes on Google Ads and Facebook Ads simultaneously. All the data funnels into one coherent dashboard or dataset that the team can trust as the single source of truth.

The benefits of streamlining via AI agents are both technical and human. Technically, having harmonized data and workflows is what enables agentic AI to thrive – when all campaign info resides in one structure, an agent can reason over the whole picture and coordinate actions optimally. For example, with unified data an agent can generate a portfolio-level report for a client with one click, instead of a strategist manually cobbling together metrics from each platform. Or, as noted, it can shift budgets across channels without waiting for a human to export/import numbers.  

On the human side, this reduces cognitive load and errors. Ad ops teams no longer have to swivel-chair between systems or copy-paste data (which inevitably introduces mistakes). Instead, they interact with a cohesive system that surfaces what they need. The AI agents handle the complexity under the hood. One notable upside is agility: with less time spent managing tools, teams can focus on strategy and creative decisions. And when something breaks or a new requirement arises, it’s easier to adjust one integrated system than six disparate ones.  

Of course, achieving this requires upfront effort – data integration and choosing the right agentic platform – but agencies increasingly see it as crucial. The alternative is to remain stuck in tech bloat while competitors move ahead with leaner, smarter operations. By slimming down the tech stack and letting coordinated AI agents take over repetitive tasks across platforms, agencies gain both efficiency and clarity – exactly what’s needed to support modern, multi-channel campaigns.

‍

4. Campaign Launch Times: Accelerating Go-to-Market with Agentic Automation

In digital advertising, speed matters. Yet many agencies struggle with slow campaign launch times due to manual processes and cross-team handoffs. The Fluency benchmark data showed that one in four agencies takes more than one week to launch a new campaign, a delay that can blunt the impact of time-sensitive promotions and frustrate clients. Launching a campaign involves numerous steps – gathering creative assets, trafficking ads in various platforms, applying targeting settings, setting up tracking, performing QA – and when done by hand, these steps often happen sequentially and require meticulous attention to detail. In other words, manual operations just don’t scale with today’s multi-platform, multi-format campaigns. Teams end up either rushing (increasing risk of errors) or delaying launches while checking all the boxes. Neither is tenable if agencies want to stay responsive in a real-time market.

Here is where the power of AI agents in advertising truly shines: by parallelizing and coordinating campaign setup tasks, MAS can shrink launch timelines from weeks to days or even hours. Consider what happens when you introduce a “Project Manager agent” (or an orchestrator agent) into the workflow. As soon as a human inputs the campaign brief and parameters, the agent can break down the work and assign subtasks to other specialized agents – much like a real project manager delegating to a team. One agent might handle creative resizing and format adaptations, while another agent configures the targeting and budget in the ad platform interfaces. Yet another agent could generate the UTM tracking codes and set up the analytics integration. In a traditional workflow, these tasks would be done one after the other by different team members; in a multi-agent system, they happen simultaneously and systematically. This is why experts note that a single AI agent isn’t enough for complex campaigns – you need a multi-agent setup to enable the “parallel thinking” and task coordination that modern media execution requires.  

The Multi-Agent System essentially acts as a well-synchronized digital team that can launch a campaign much faster than a human team working stepwise. The outcome is not just faster launches, but also higher throughput – you can run more campaigns concurrently with the same team size. This agility can be a competitive differentiator for an agency (e.g. being able to respond to a viral trend with a new ad campaign in 1-2 days, while a slower competitor might miss the moment). And importantly, faster launches don’t come at the expense of quality when AI agents are properly configured. These agents follow best-practice templates and checklists rigorously every time, reducing the chance of human oversight errors (such as forgetting to set a frequency cap or a location targeting parameter). Humans remain in the loop for strategic decisions and final approvals, which keeps the work aligned with client goals and brand safety. In sum, Multi-Agent Systems are compressing the go-to-market cycle for campaigns – a critical improvement for marketing operations in an era when timing is everything.

‍

Roadmap: Phased Integration of AI Agents in Agency Operations

Adopting AI agents and Multi-Agent Systems in an agency setting is a journey. Leaders should approach it strategically, rolling out automation in phases to ensure a smooth transition to hybrid operations. A high-level phased roadmap might look like this:

‍

1. Foundation – Centralize Data and Tools: First, audit and consolidate your tech stack. Ensure all your campaign data (across search, social, display, etc.) can be integrated into a single system or data warehouse. This may involve choosing an Advertising Resource Management platform or building connectors between tools. The goal is to eliminate data silos and create a clean environment where AI agents can access a “single source of truth” for campaigns. In parallel, start automating simple, standalone tasks (e.g. automated reporting) to get teams comfortable with AI assistance.

2. Pilot AI Agents for Monitoring & Insights: Identify a few high-impact, labor-intensive workflows (such as budget pacing or basic optimizations) and introduce AI agents to assist in those areas. For example, deploy an agent to send real-time pacing alerts or to compile multi-channel performance summaries each morning. At this stage, humans still execute the decisions, but the AI agent acts as a smart assistant, crunching numbers and watching for issues 24/7. This builds trust in the technology and provides immediate relief for the team. Measure the time saved and error reduction.

3. Scale to Execution Automation: Once the team trusts the AI’s recommendations, gradually permit agents to take direct action under defined conditions. This could mean the budget pacing agent now not only alerts but also automatically reallocates spend within set limits, or a bidding agent directly adjusts bids across campaigns hourly. Expand the roster of agents: add creative generation tools into the workflow, use an agent to handle routine campaign launch steps, etc. At this phase, multi-agent coordination kicks in – agents start handling entire sub-processes (monitor–decide–act loops) with humans providing oversight. It’s wise to implement an AI governance framework here, setting rules for when human intervention is required, to maintain transparency and accountability.

4. Fully Hybrid Operations – Optimize & Innovate: In the final phase, AI agents become ingrained in every facet of operations, working alongside humans. The agency workflow is redesigned so that anything that can be automated is automated. Strategists and creatives now spend the bulk of their time on strategy, client consulting, and inventive work, while agents handle the execution and analysis grunt work. Regularly review performance: are campaigns launching faster, is ROI improving, are more clients handled per person? Use those metrics to further tune the MAS. At this stage, the agency can explore advanced capabilities – e.g. linking agents to client-facing dashboards for transparency, or developing proprietary AI models for niche tasks (a custom optimization algorithm, for instance). The organization’s culture should also fully embrace continuous learning, with staff constantly upskilling to work effectively with AI and to interpret the rich insights the agents produce.

‍

By following a phased approach, agencies can mitigate disruption and ensure that human teams adapt alongside the technology. Each phase delivers value (quick wins in efficiency or accuracy) while moving closer to the end-state: a nimble, AI-augmented operation.

‍

Toward a Hybrid Future in AdOps

Media agencies are entering an era where success will be defined by how well humans and AI agents can collaborate to drive better outcomes. The most critical operational challenges – from scaling client portfolios without burning out staff, over nailing budget pacing and simplifying bloated tech stacks to speeding up launches and creative output – are now solvable with the smart application of AI and automation. Crucially, this isn’t about replacing the human element. It’s about elevating it.  

The agentic framework underpinning these solutions ensures that AI agents aren’t just fancy chatbots or scripts, but goal-driven collaborators that can reason, act, and learn within advertising workflows. And when multiple agents work in concert, guided by unified data and human strategy, the effect is transformative. Imagine a “virtual team” of specialized agents constantly optimizing every aspect of an account: one watching spend, another tweaking bids, another testing creatives, another compiling results. This is not a distant future scenario – it’s happening now in forward-thinking agencies. Businesses that leverage such Multi-Agent Systems can automate complex, repeatable tasks and scale their marketing efforts exponentially.

From a competitive standpoint, adopting AI agents in advertising is quickly shifting from a novelty to a necessity. Clients are demanding more for less, faster turnarounds, and data-driven precision. Without AI, meeting those demands while maintaining profitability is a losing battle. With AI, agencies large and small can punch above their weight. Thanks to AI and automation, companies of all sizes can now access technologies that were once the exclusive domain of large corporations. In practical terms, a 50-person independent media  agency with a strong AI-augmented process can rival a 500-person traditional shop in throughput and sophistication of service – a huge strategic advantage in the market.

‍