How to Get Started with Multi-Agent AI (Build vs Buy) - A Guide for In-House Media Teams

FAQ – AI Agents: Build vs Buy Approach

This section aims to address the most frequent questions around this decision-making process. Whether you're optimizing for speed, control, scalability, or cost-efficiency, the FAQ below outlines key considerations to help guide your approach to AI agent development and integration.

‍

What exactly is the difference between a multi-agent AI system and a single agent?

A single AI Agent performs one type of task and has limited scope. A Multi-Agent System is a coordinated network of many AI agents, each specialized in a different task, working together. This allows automation of entire workflows, not just individual tasks. For example, instead of just optimizing bids (single-task tool), a multi-agent setup could plan the campaign, create content, adjust bids, and report results in tandem. The agents can also check each other’s work – e.g. a “Supervisor” agent correcting errors from a “creator” agent – which improves accuracy. Overall, multi-agent systems are more powerful and reliable because they combine multiple skills and cross-verify outputs, whereas single tools operate in isolation.

‍

Do AI agents replace the need for a human marketing team?

No – think of AI agents as an extension of your team, not a replacement. They excel at the heavy lifting: crunching numbers, executing rote tasks, and reacting instantly to data changes. This augments what human marketers can do, allowing your team to focus on strategy, creative direction, and high-level decision-making. Human oversight and input remain vital. The Agentic AI might recommend actions, but humans set the goals and ensure the brand’s voice and customer relationships are managed properly. In practice, organizations find the best results when AI agents work alongside humans in a collaborative way.

‍

Why do marketing teams consider building their own AI agents?  

Many tech-savvy marketing teams initially feel the temptation to build their own AI agents from scratch. With the abundance of open-source AI models and APIs available today, it might seem feasible to DIY an agent that automates your Google, Facebook, or Amazon Ads tasks. However, the reality is that building a full-fledged agentic media system in-house is extremely challenging. As one analysis bluntly put it, “75% of in-house AI agent projects will fail” – not for lack of smart people, but because teams underestimate the hidden complexity (MINT.ai).  

‍

What makes building a Multi-Agent media system in-house so difficult?

Creating a robust multi-agent solution requires more than a few hackathon prototypes; it’s akin to setting up your own AI R&D lab within your company.

Some pitfalls of the DIY route include:

• Integration overload: You’d need to integrate with every ad platform, analytics tool, and database your team uses. Writing connectors and APIs to, say, Google Ads, Meta Ads, Twitter, TikTok, LinkedIn, your web analytics, CRM, etc., is a monumental task. A single brand might use dozens of tools, and connecting each one reliably (and maintaining those connections as they update) is a full-time job. For perspective, some specialized marketing AI platforms come with hundreds of pre-built integrations to various media and data sources – the kind of connectivity an internal project would struggle to achieve on its own. Building that integration layer in-house could take months or years of engineering work.

• Multi-Agent orchestration expertise: As discussed, true media automation needs multiple agents working in concert, not just one. Engineering a system where agents can coordinate, pass tasks, and double-check each other is extremely complex. It involves advanced AI architecture (e.g. using retrieval augmented generation, knowledge graphs, or specialized models for each task) and careful design to avoid conflicts and errors. This is cutting-edge AI work – something typically only seen in research labs or AI-first companies. Most marketing organizations simply don’t have this depth of AI engineering talent in-house.  

• Continuous maintenance and support: Building an AI agent is not a one-time project – it’s the start of an ongoing software product that you must support. From day one, your team would be responsible for monitoring the AI’s performance, fixing bugs, updating it for new regulations or platform changes, and improving its capabilities. This means possibly diverting your best analysts or tech-savvy marketers into roles as full-time AI product managers, data engineers, or compliance auditors. The opportunity cost is huge: every hour spent maintaining a homegrown system is an hour not spent on core marketing strategy. In other words, trying to become a software company internally can distract from your main marketing mission.

‍

What are the benefits of using established Multi-Agent AI platforms?

The alternative is to partner with established platforms or vendors that provide multi-agent AI solutions as a service. Today’s market is quickly evolving, with both large tech companies and specialized startups offering agent-based AI tools.

Going with a vendor or platform is generally faster and safer for most brands in-housing their media. You benefit from the provider’s ongoing R&D: as new algorithms or better AI models come out, the vendor updates the system (for example, swapping in a more advanced bidding algorithm or a more creative language model), and all customers immediately benefit. The platform also keeps up with API changes and adds new channel integrations as the marketing landscape evolves, saving your team the effort. Essentially, you’re plugging into an AI that evolves with you – one platform described this approach as being a “partner that evolves with you,” since the AI gets smarter and more capable each year you use it. This continuous improvement is hard to match with an internal build.

‍

What specialized vendors offer purpose-built agentic systems for marketers?

Specialized vendors provide agentic systems built specifically for advertising and media management. For instance, MINT.ai is one provider that offers a multi-agent platform for media teams. Their solution comes pre-trained on marketing, media and advertising knowledge and integrates out-of-the-box with common ad platforms and analytics tools. Essentially, vendors like this supply a ready-made “brain” for your in-house agency. They handle the heavy lifting of integration, maintenance, and AI model training. A good platform will let you plug in your accounts (e.g. Google Ads, Facebook Ads, DSPs, etc.) with just a few clicks, granting the AI agents access to your data and campaigns. From there, the agents can start optimizing and collaborating almost immediately, because they’ve been pre-loaded with industry knowledge and strategies. You might still configure certain parameters or do a light fine-tuning for your brand’s specifics, but you’re not starting from a blank slate. This means you skip the lengthy learning curve – the agents already “understand” marketing best practices and can begin delivering value on day one.

‍

What are the first steps to adopt a Multi-Agent System effectively?

Of course, adopting a Multi-Agent System still requires planning. Here are some next steps and considerations for a brand looking to leverage this technology:

1. Identify high-impact use cases: Start by pinpointing which parts of your media and advertising workflow could benefit most from agentic automation. Is it the bid optimization and budget pacing across channels? Creative versioning and testing? Audience segmentation and personalization? Or perhaps reporting and insights generation? Look for tasks that are data-driven, repetitive, or time-sensitive – these are often ideal for AI agents to take over.

2. Audit your data and tools: Ensure you have the data infrastructure to support AI. Multi-agent systems thrive on data – performance metrics, conversion data, customer info, etc. Is your analytics setup feeding into a central place the AI can access? Are your ad accounts well-organized? You may need to clean up some data pipelines or ensure APIs access for the AI platform. The good news is many vendors handle integration for you (as noted, with numerous pre-built connectors), but you still need to grant permissions and have your accounts in order.

3. Evaluate vendors: Research the platforms available that meet your needs. Important factors include: does the system have proven case studies in advertising? What specific capabilities (channels supported, types of agents) does it offer? How does it handle data privacy and security? Also consider the vendor’s expertise in advertising – a general AI tool is not the same as one fine-tuned for media buying. Look for solutions that mention multi-agent architecture or specialized advertising knowledge. It can be helpful to do a pilot or proof-of-concept with a vendor on a small campaign to gauge results.

4. Build human + AI processes: Plan for how your team will interact with the AI agents day-to-day. The goal is human-AI collaboration, not just handing everything over to robots. Determine what decisions the AI can make autonomously (with your oversight via dashboards or alerts) and where human approval is needed (especially in early stages or for sensitive actions). Train your team on interpreting the AI’s suggestions and managing exceptions. A best practice is to have a “human in the loop” initially – for example, the AI can draft a campaign plan or recommend budget shifts, and a human marketer reviews and approves it until trust is built. Over time, as confidence in the system grows, you might automate more fully.

5. Monitor, measure, and iterate: Treat the deployment as an evolving process. Set clear KPIs (e.g., reduced manual hours, improved ROAS, faster campaign launch times) to measure the impact of the multi-agent system. Monitor outcomes closely, especially in the first few months. If the AI is underperforming in an area, engage with the vendor for tuning, or adjust the configuration. Also gather feedback from your team – is the AI truly reducing workload and improving results? Use that feedback to refine how you use the system. Remember, the AI agents will also be learning and improving with more data, so you should see gains compound over time.

The key is to start with clear objectives and maintain involvement in the process – the technology is powerful, but human guidance ensures it aligns with your brand’s goals and values.

‍

Our industry has very specific challenges – can a Multi-Agent System handle that?

Most likely, yes. Multi-agent AI systems can be trained or configured with industry-specific knowledge, and many are already being used across sectors from consumer goods to finance. In advertising, the core challenges (optimizing media spend, personalizing content, reacting to data) are quite similar across industries – the AI can learn the particular context of your vertical. In fact, some pre-trained agent platforms have been trained on cross-industry campaign data, so they come with a broad understanding of what works in different contexts (MINT.ai). For a retail brand, a multi-agent system might know seasonal trends and inventory considerations; for a CPG brand, it might handle retailer-specific campaigns or compliance requirements. During onboarding, you can also fine-tune the system with your own historical data and rules. The beauty of these AI agents is their adaptability – given the right initial training and ongoing learning, they can apply their abilities to virtually any vertical’s marketing scenario.

‍

How do we ensure the AI agents stick to our brand guidelines and compliance needs?

Ensuring brand safety and compliance is a top priority, and multi-agent systems address this by including specialized governance agents. These are AI agents tasked with monitoring and enforcing rules – for example, a Supervisor agent might review any auto-generated ad copy against a list of forbidden phrases or tone guidelines. The system essentially has built-in checkpoints for quality and compliance. Additionally, any reputable AI marketing platform will allow you to set guardrails and approval workflows. You might require that certain high-stakes actions (like media plan approvals) get human sign-off via the dashboard. It’s also wise to start with narrower autonomy and expand as trust grows – you can progressively let the AI handle more once it proves it can follow the rules. Finally, maintain logging and transparency: multi-agent systems typically log their decisions and reasoning, so you can audit what the AI did and why. This transparency helps maintain trust that the AI is operating within your guidelines (some systems even provide an explanation of how agents reached a decision). In sum, with the right setup, AI agents can actually enhance brand safety by rigorously checking every action against predefined standards.

‍

Is adopting a Multi-Agent System expensive? What about ROI?

The cost will vary by solution (ranging from software subscription fees to usage-based pricing), but many companies find the investment pays off through efficiency gains and performance improvements. By automating tasks, you may be able to redeploy staff to more valuable projects instead of hiring additional headcount. Also, better optimized campaigns can yield higher ROI on ad spend – even a small percentage improvement in ROAS can translate to significant revenue over time, more than covering the AI’s cost. When considering ROI, factor in the “opportunity cost” savings as well: what manual errors might be avoided, and what growth opportunities could be captured, by having an AI continuously fine-tune your campaigns? Those can be substantial. One study noted that early in-house AI projects often take longer than planned to achieve value, but using pre-built, specialized agents can accelerate this payoff. Many vendors will help model the ROI for you, and some may offer pilot programs to prove the value on a smaller scale before you commit fully.  

‍

We’re a small in-house team – do we need our own engineers or data scientists to use these AI agents?

Not necessarily. One of the advantages of choosing a vendor solution is that the technical heavy lifting is done for you. Good multi-agent platforms are designed to be used by marketers, not just coders. They typically have user-friendly interfaces where you can connect your accounts and knowledge base, set goals (like target CPA or ROAS), and then let the AI run with it. There might be some initial setup and configuration, but it’s often comparable to setting up any marketing software. The platform’s team handles the backend integration maintenance, model updates, and so on. Of course, having analytically minded team members helps in interpreting AI outputs and refining strategies in collaboration with the AI. But you don’t need an in-house PhD in AI to start benefiting from Multi-Agent systems. In fact, using a pre-trained system means you skip the hardest phase – training the AI from scratch – because the agent already understands advertising and just needs your specific inputs to get going. That said, you should plan for some team training on the new tool: your marketers will need to learn new workflows and how to best leverage the AI’s recommendations. Many vendors offer training and support to help your team become proficient in using the agent system effectively.

‍

How is a Multi-Agent AI System different from traditional marketing automation?

Traditional marketing automation (think of rule-based engines that send emails or adjust bids on schedule) operates on predefined if-then rules set by humans. It’s useful, but limited – it doesn’t “think” or adapt beyond the scenarios anticipated by its programming. A Multi-Agent AI system, on the other hand, is far more intelligent and autonomous. It can handle unstructured tasks and make decisions in novel situations by reasoning, not just by following static rules. For example, traditional automation might let you schedule social posts in advance (rule-based), but a Multi-Agent AI could decide when is the best time to post by analyzing real-time engagement data, and even adjust the content on the fly if audience sentiment shifts. In essence, AI agents bring cognitive abilities – understanding context, planning, learning from results – which classic automation lacks. They can re-plan a workflow if needed, connect to various tools dynamically, and collaborate to troubleshoot issues (something static automation can’t do). This doesn’t mean you throw out your existing automation; rather, AI agents supercharge it with a layer of intelligence and flexibility that was not possible before. The move from simple automation to agentic AI is like moving from a fixed assembly line to a team of smart robots that can rearrange the assembly line on the fly for optimal output.

‍

What are the key takeaways for in-housing teams to keep in mind for next steps?

In-housing media and advertising gives brands control and efficiency – and Multi-Agent AI systems are emerging as the key enabler to make in-housing truly excel. By deploying a coordinated team of AI agents, in-house teams can overcome resource limits and complexity, achieving results on par with (or better than) large external agencies. These systems tackle the pain points of modern advertising (data overload, real-time optimization, personalization demands) by working faster and smarter than humanly possible.

‍

As you consider the next steps, keep these takeaways in mind:

• Multi-Agent AI acts as a force-multiplier for in-house teams: It automates complex ad operations across channels, allowing a small team to manage large-scale campaigns with greater precision and less effort. Routine tasks are handled by AI, while your human experts focus on strategy and creative innovation.

• The technology is here and now: This isn’t a distant future concept – forward-thinking brands and “top-performing media teams” are already using pre-trained AI agent systems to orchestrate campaigns. In-house marketing teams that adopt these tools are seeing faster optimizations and data-driven decisions from day one.

• Start with a clear strategy and trusted partners: Identify where Agentic AI can help you most and consider partnering with vendors who specialize in marketing AI. Building your own system from scratch is an option, but it comes with significant complexity and maintenance overhead. Many brands find greater success by leveraging platforms that are ready-made for advertising needs.

• Maintain human oversight and continuously learn: Success with AI agents requires keeping your marketers in the loop and treating the AI as a collaborative partner. Monitor results, provide feedback, and adjust the system’s parameters as needed. Over time, both your team and the AI will mature – the team learns to harness the AI better, and the AI learns your business nuances. This virtuous cycle can lead to substantial improvements in marketing performance.

• Competitive advantage for early adopters: Those who embrace multi-agent “agentic” workflows today will gain a long-term competitive advantage in the digital world. They’ll be able to react to market changes faster, deliver more personalized customer experiences, and run campaigns more cost-effectively. In a landscape where every impression and click matters, having an AI-powered in-house operation could be the differentiator that sets your brand apart.

‍

By combining the strengths of your in-house talent with the relentless efficiency of AI agents, you position your brand for advertising success in the data-driven era. Multi-agent AI systems are not just a buzzword but a practical tool to help in-house teams work smarter, scale their impact, and achieve new levels of marketing agility. The brands that leverage this approach are writing the next chapter of marketing – one where intelligent automation and human creativity together drive growth. Embracing that future now can put your organization on the cutting edge of advertising innovation.

‍